ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Morphologic diversity of the epididymis in orchiectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The epididymis frequently exhibits a broad spectrum of non-neoplastic epithelial and stromal alterations that may mimic neoplastic or obstructive processes in orchiectomy specimens. Existing data are mostly derived from single-institution series. This multi-institutional study aimed to provide a comprehensive, contemporary, multi-institutional analysis of the prevalence, spectrum, and clinicopathological associations of epididymal morphological variations in a large orchiectomy cohort. This retrospective study included 1,528 orchiectomy specimens from multiple academic centers. All hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides containing epididymal tissue were systematically reviewed using a standardized protocol. Morphological features assessed included atrophy, intranuclear inclusions, lipofuscin pigment, cribriform hyperplasia, Paneth cell-like metaplasia, nuclear atypia, clear cell change, smooth-muscle proliferation, vascular and duct ectasia, myxoid change, calcification, hematoma, and inflammation. Associations with underlying testicular pathologies were analyzed statistically. 66% (1004/1528) were performed for testicular neoplasms, which were predominantly germ cell tumors derived from germ cell neoplasia in situ (87.5%, 878/1004). The most common epididymal alterations were lipofuscin pigment (49.9%, 762/1528), intranuclear inclusions (40.3%, 616/1528), atrophy (35.4%, 541/1528), and duct ectasia (35.3%, 539/1528). Non-tumoral cases more frequently exhibited atrophy (58.4%, 306/524 vs. 23.4%, 235/1004), duct ectasia (45.2%, 237/524 vs. 30.1%, 302/1004), inflammation (21.9%, 115/524 vs. 2.7%, 27/1004), and hematoma (5.9%, 31/524 vs. 0.2%, 2/1004) (p < 0.0001 for all). Tumoral cases showed higher rates of cribriform hyperplasia (28.5%, 286/1004 vs. 16.4%, 86/524), Paneth cell-like metaplasia (12.4%, 124/1004 vs. 1.9%, 10/524), nuclear atypia (21.9%, 220/1004 vs. 17.2%, 90/524), and clear cell change (21.7%, 218/1004 vs. 14.3%, 75/524) (all p ≤ 0.03). Several features, including atrophy, lipofuscin pigment, cribriform hyperplasia, clear cell change, and calcification, showed significant variation across tumor subtypes. Non-neoplastic epithelial and stromal alterations of the epididymis are common and histologically diverse, often co-occurring and varying by underlying testicular pathology. Awareness of these patterns is essential to avoid misinterpretation, especially in oncologic settings. This study provides the largest contemporary dataset to date, offering a robust histopathological framework for epididymal assessment in routine surgical pathology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.