ArticleActa parasitologica2026
First Report of Morphological Anomalies in Haemaphysalis megaspinosa Ticks from Japan.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMorphological anomalies in ticks have been described in various species. Gynandromorphism, asymmetry, and lack of legs are well documented anomalies worldwide. However, only two cases have been reported in Japan. Furthermore, few studies have documented anomalies which could impact the identification of ticks. This study reports morphological anomalies in Haemaphysalis megaspinosa ticks for the first time.
methodHost-questing H. megaspinosa ticks were collected from the southern part of Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan, using a flannel sheet (70 × 100 cm) dragged over vegetation. Morphological observations were performed using a light microscope.
resultsA total of 1,352 H. megaspinosa nymphs were collected, and morphological anomalies of the capitulum were observed in four individuals (0.3%). Among these, three individuals had a 3/3 dental formula, differing from those of normal individuals which have a 2/2 dental formula. The remaining specimen had a 3/2 dental formula and deformed palps.
conclusionSince the dental formula is a key morphological feature for identification of Haemaphysalis nymphs, this anomaly could potentially lead to misidentification. Hence, such anomalies, although potentially rare, are important to document considering accurate morphological identification. Further studies are needed to clarify the actual status of tick morphological anomalies in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41528406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.