Observational studyEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Prehospital whole-blood transfusion in two countries: comparison of patient characteristics in Sweden and the Northeastern United States.
Observational study in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrehospital transfusion of whole blood (WB) is being adopted in civilian Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems, but the characteristics of patients receiving WB may differ by region. We aimed to compare prehospital WB transfusion programs in Sweden and in the Northeastern United States, focusing on patient demographics and transfusion details.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of EMS-initiated WB transfusions in three regions in Sweden (2020-2024) and in multiple EMS programs in the Northeastern United States (2024). We compared patient age, sex (with female patients categorized as of childbearing potential (FCP) if ≤ 50 years), indication for transfusion (trauma vs. non-trauma), and prehospital WB transfusion practice (number of units initiated/completed and RhD type).
resultsA total of 196 patients received prehospital WB (85 in Sweden, 111 in U.S.). Sweden's WB recipients were younger (median age ~ 41 vs. 59 years) and more often trauma patients (90.6% vs. 72.1%) compared to the U.S. COHORT: The proportion of female patients was similar, but Sweden had a higher percentage of FCPs among WB recipients (24% vs. 8%). Swedish EMS were more likely to transfuse multiple units before hospital arrival. Practice differed in RhD type: 97% of U.S. patients received RhD-positive WB, whereas 91% of Swedish patients received RhD-negative WB. Consequently, all 9 FCPs in the U.S. group received at least one Rh-positive unit, compared to 1 of 18 FCPs in Sweden.
conclusionSignificant differences exist between Sweden and the Northeastern U.S. in prehospital WB transfusion demographics and practices. These findings highlight that one should not assume similar patient profiles or transfusion strategies across different countries' EMS WB programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.