ArticleMicrobial genomics2026
Environmental surveillance of bacteria in a new intensive care unit using plate sweeps.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hospital environment plays a critical role in the transmission of infectious diseases. Surveillance methods often rely on selective enrichment or deep metagenomic sequencing, which both have significant drawbacks in terms of community resolution and cost. Plate sweeps provide a practical moderate approach to cultivate a wide range of bacteria, capturing more diversity than a single colony pick without high sequencing costs. Here, we use this approach to characterize a newly built hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Queensland, Australia. Between November 2023 and February 2024, we sampled 78 sites within an 8-bed private hospital ICU pre- and post-patient introduction to the environment. Samples were enriched on non-selective media before DNA was extracted from whole plate sweeps and sequenced using Illumina. We assessed species, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes, virulence genes and transmission across all samples and between the pre- and post-patient samples using Kraken2, AbritAMR and Tracs. While the rate of positive microbial growth within the ICU environment did not change significantly pre- and post-patient introduction, the post-patient microbiome consisted of largely different bacterial species; of 22 genera identified, only 3 genera were represented at both timepoints. Post-patient samples were enriched in AMR genes, including resistance to fosfomycin, quinolones and beta-lactams. Common genera identified post-patient were
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.