Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528121›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Between-species variation in neocortical sulcal anatomy of the carnivoran brain.

Magdalena Boch, Katrin Karadachka, Kep-Kee Loh, R Austin Benn, Lea Roumazeilles, Mads F Bertelsen, Paul R Manger, Ethan Wriggelsworth, Simon Spiro, Muhammad A Spocter and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Magdalena BochOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3627-5180
Katrin KaradachkaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Kep-Kee LohMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
R Austin BennOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3728-7036
Lea RoumazeillesOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mads F BertelsenCopenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-7499
Paul R MangerSchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ethan WriggelsworthZoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon SpiroZoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.
Muhammad A SpocterSchool of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Philippa J JohnsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States.
Kamilla Avelino-de-SouzaBrazilian Neurobiodiversity Network, Physics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nina PatzkeDepartment of Biological Science, Faculty of Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Claus LammSocial, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5422-0653
Karla L MillerOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2511-3189
Jérôme SalletOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexandre A KhrapitchevDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-6635
Benjamin C TendlerOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-8665
Rogier B MarsOxford University Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-8631

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/J4828Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/P34675Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019814/1Medical Research Council MR/Y010698/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 10.35802/202788Wellcome Trust 10.35802/222829Wellcome Trust 10.35802/224573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carnivorans are an important study object for comparative neuroscience, as they exhibit a wide range of behaviours, ecological adaptations, and social structures. Previous studies have mainly examined relative brain size, but a comprehensive understanding of brain diversity requires the investigation of other aspects of their neuroanatomy. Here, we obtained primarily post-mortem brain scans from 26 species of the order Carnivora, spanning across eight families with diverse representatives and including additional individuals for selected species, to create the largest carnivoran brain collection to date. We reconstructed their cortical surfaces and examined neocortical sulcal anatomy to establish a framework for systematic interspecies comparisons, revealing distinct regional variations in sulcal anatomy, potentially related to the species' behaviour and ecology. Arctoidea species with pronounced forepaw dexterity exhibited complex sulcal configurations in the presumed somatosensory cortex but low sulcal complexity in the presumed visual and auditory occipitotemporal cortex. Canidae had the largest number of unique major sulci, including one in the occipital cortex and highly social canids featuring an additional frontal cortex sulcus. We also observed differentially complex occipitotemporal sulcal patterns in Felidae and Canidae, indicative of changes in auditory and visual areas that may be related to foraging strategies and social behaviour. In conclusion, this study presents an inventory of the sulcal anatomy of a number of rarely studied carnivoran brains including detailed digital atlases and establishes a framework and novel avenues for further investigations employing a variety of neuroimaging modalities to reveal more about carnivoran brain diversity.

Indexed as

CarnivoraNeocortexAnimalsSpecies SpecificityCaniformiaCarnivoracomparative neuroimagingdogFeliformianeuroecologyneurosciencesulcal neuroanatomy

Identifiers

PMID41528121
PMCPMC12799212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.