ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Shedding Light on Halos: Quantifying the Impact of the Diffractive Profile in Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diffractive intraocular lenses reshape 577-nm retinal laser photocoagulation spots in a model eye.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Halos are the most common source of discomfort after implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs). Although multiple causes are attributed to halos, there is no clear consensus about the specific role of each factor, especially the diffractive profile. This study aims to quantify the isolated effect of the diffractive profile on halo formation using numerical modeling. Methods: A simplified model eye was implemented in Zemax OpticStudio to simulate the optical performance of two different diffractive designs (sinusoidal and apodized kinoform) obtained from commercially available MIOLs. Simulations were performed for three pupil diameters under both monochromatic (green) and polychromatic illumination. To evaluate halo size, the half intensity diameter (HD) metric was used. Results: At the far focus, the kinoform MIOL exhibited a reduction in halo size as the pupil diameter increased. In contrast, the sinusoidal MIOL performed best at the intermediate focus for 6.0 mm, whereas at 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm the HD was nearly three times higher. In both cases, no significant difference was observed between monochromatic and polychromatic illumination. Conclusions: The observed differences in halo formation between the diffractive profiles studied can be primarily attributed to the way each design distributes optical energy across its diffraction orders. Translational Relevance: This study shows that diffractive profile of MIOLs significantly affects halo formation, aiding surgeons in interpreting patient complaints and evaluating lens designs critically. This approach also offers a useful tool for designers to minimize halos in new lenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.