Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528105›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Screening Questions to Identify Low Vision and Acuity-Defined Legal Blindness.

Yueh-Hsun Wu, Deyue Yu, Judith Goldstein, MiYoung Kwon, Chun Wang, Gordon E Legge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yueh-Hsun WuCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Deyue YuCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Judith GoldsteinJohns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
MiYoung KwonDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Chun WangMeasurement and Statistics, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Gordon E LeggeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING: NORMAL AND LOW VISIONR01EY002934 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LEGGE, GORDON E · 1985 to 2018
$5.8M
Efficient Assessment of Visual Deficits in Low VisionR01EY025658 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YU, DEYUE · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002934NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Visual screening is important in public health, but visual acuity (VA) testing is costly at scale. We used items from a validated VA survey with 100 yes/no questions to identify screening questions for low vision (VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR or 20/40) and legal blindness as defined by the VA criterion (VA ≤ 1 logMAR or 20/200). Methods: We analyzed data from 385 adults with measured VA who completed the survey. Participants were classified positive if they answered "no" to selected single, pair, and triplet items for each threshold. We computed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: For low vision, "In a fast-food restaurant, can you read the posted menus?" yielded AUC = 0.85 (sensitivity = 0.89; specificity = 0.81). For legal blindness, "When seated in front of a computer, are you able to read the letters on the keyboard keys?" produced AUC = 0.80 (sensitivity = 0.89; specificity = 0.71). For both screening thresholds, adding a second item increased AUC by ≤0.05; a third item gave no further improvement. Conclusions: One targeted question can screen for low vision or acuity-defined legal blindness with good discrimination; a two-item pair offers a compact option when higher specificity is desired. These brief, functional screens are practical when in-person VA testing is impractical.

Indexed as

BlindnessVision, LowVision ScreeningVisual AcuityAdultAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41528105
PMCPMC12811891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.