ArticleRadiology and oncology2026
Coronary computed tomographic angiography and atherosclerosis: prognostic validation of coronary scores in a Slovenian cohort.
Article in Radiology and oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) provides information on coronary atherosclerosis burden and extent. In the present analysis, we compared the prognostic impact of coronary scores (maximal coronary stenosis, segment involvement score [SIS] and segment stenosis scores [SSS], and the CCTA-modified Duke score). PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed CCTA images of patients with suspected coronary obstruction and excluded patients who underwent planned revascularization. Using Cox multivariate analysis, we estimated the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different coronary scores to predict death, myocardial infarction, and late unplanned revascularizations (as individual and composite endpoints). Model performance was evaluated using area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).
resultsWe included 750 patients (median age 61 years, 54% women) with a median follow up 1,465 days. Unadjusted HR for major cardiovascular events ranged from 3.87 (95% CI 1.49-10.0, p = 0.005) for obstructive disease (> 50% stenosis in any vessel) to 1.17 (1.09-1.25, p < 0.001) for SIS (each additional segment involved). Predictions remained significant for all endpoints and after adjusting for coronary artery calcium score and risk factors. Area under curve (AUC) for coronary stenosis was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.82), for SIS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.83), for SSS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.82), and for Duke score was 0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.74).
conclusionsOur study has confirmed that coronary atherosclerosis burden and extent independently predict major cardiovascular events in patients who had undergone CCTA, but were not referred for invasive diagnostic procedures and revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.