ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Structome-AlignViewer: On Confidence Assessment in Structure-Aware Alignments.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary diversification of polyketide synthase (PKS) enzymes in Monascus purpureus strains for exploitation as a molecular factory.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Structome-TM: complementing dataset assembly for structural phylogenetics by addressing size-based biases.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein structure-based comparison provides a framework for uncovering deep evolutionary relationships that can escape conventional sequence-based approaches. Encoding three-dimensional protein structures using a simplified structure-aware alphabet can lead to compact, comparable strings that retain key spatial relationships. Although this enables comparison, structure-aware alignments can experience misaligned regions, particularly when comparing proteins with substantial divergence in fold architecture. To address this, a web-based resource, Structome-AlignViewer, is introduced in this work for evaluating the quality of structure-aware alignments through both spatial mapping of alignment columns to protein structures and quantitative confidence scoring. Confidence is computed from pairwise structural substitutions between adjacent inputs and normalized within each alignment to highlight relatively well-supported columns. To provide broader context, thousands of alignments from established structural classification systems were analyzed, allowing for an empirical comparative statistic to be derived to assess alignment quality. The option to exclude gap-rich regions enables users to refine alignments and focus on conserved structural cores. This approach provides an interpretable method for assessing structural alignment quality and supports more robust comparative and evolutionary analyses. Structome-AlignViewer is freely available at https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/structome_alignviewer/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.