ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2026
STOP algorithm for bedside mechanical ventilation: Standardized, evidence-based management of critically ill patients.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed significant variability in mechanical ventilation training and bedside practices, highlighting the necessity for standardized, actionable protocols. This study aimed to develop the Standard Training and Operating Procedure (STOP), an evidence-based algorithm designed for managing mechanically ventilated critically ill patients and troubleshooting patient-ventilator interactions. Utilizing the Successive Approximation Model (SAM), we reviewed current guidelines and expert recommendations, created a minimum-viable prototype during a multidisciplinary "savvy start," and refined it through seven iterative review cycles involving 33 frontline clinicians. The finalized tool underwent external evaluation via a Modified-Delphi process within the Checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury (CERTAIN) network, engaging 50 clinicians from 19 countries across four continents, with a consensus threshold of ≥70%. STOP consists of eight sequential bedside checkpoints: abnormal vital signs/ventilator alarms, assessment of ventilation adequacy, elevated peak pressure, elevated plateau pressure, lung protection against ventilator-induced lung injury, risk of oxygen toxicity, patient-ventilator asynchrony, and readiness for spontaneous awakening and breathing trials. The Delphi agreement across these steps ranged from 82% to 96%, supporting the tool's face validity and clinical relevance. STOP offers a practical framework to minimize practice variability and enhance the safety of mechanical ventilation; however, prospective implementation studies are necessary to assess its impact on adherence and patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.