ArticleItalian journal of food safety2026
Dry-aged and dry-cured fish: a critical review of the literature and food safety aspects.
Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fish curing is a preservation method that has evolved into a culinary practice, combining traditional techniques with modern food science. Its main aims are to reduce water activity to extend shelf life, inhibit foodborne pathogens, and enhance the flavor and texture of the products. Recently, controlled maturing techniques in dedicated cabinets, previously associated exclusively with meat, have begun to attract interest among chefs, restaurants, and food companies, also in the field of preservation and flavor enhancement of fish. These methods involve exposing fish to controlled temperature, humidity, and airflow in dedicated cabinets for periods ranging from days to weeks, depending on species and desired outcomes. Despite the ongoing global spread of these methods, there is still a lack of specific guidelines for food business operators (FBOs) and regulatory references. This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the literature on fish maturation in dedicated cabinets, exploring food safety principles and identifying tools to support the economic and commercial potential of these technologies. A key distinction for FBOs and consumers is between dry-curing and dry-aging. Both encompass maturation in controlled environments, but dry-curing includes salting and the addition of spices and additives, resulting in ready-to-eat products. In contrast, for dry-aging, fish is simply degutted, scaled, and directly hung within cabinets. Although the literature remains limited, it is evident that monitoring of critical parameters (temperature, humidity, airflow) is essential to minimize spoilage, microbiological risk, and biogenic amine formation. FBOs must apply general good manufacturing practices (GMPs) and good hygiene practices (GHPs) for fish processing and some GMPs and GHPs specific to each dry-aging and dry-curing process, which must be individually validated. Further research is needed to optimize and validate processes for various species and to better understand biochemical and microbial changes. Moreover, specific guidelines for the food industry/operators to properly carry out these processes and ensure that the resulting products are safe for consumers should be drafted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.