ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Adaptive multi-view information bottleneck for multi-omics data clustering.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent advances in single-cell sequencing have transformed precise measurement of gene expression at cellular resolution, enabling unprecedented dissection of cellular heterogeneity and intricate biological processes. The accumulation of multi-omics data offers new avenues for cell clustering-a critical foundation for cell-type identification and downstream analyses. However, substantial challenges persist in simultaneously achieving effective integration of complementary information in multi-omics data and their appropriate weight allocation.
resultsHere, we propose an Adaptive Multi-View clustering framework with the Information Bottleneck principle to solve the multi-omics data clustering task (named scAMVIB). The proposed model could learn multi-view omics representations that capture both inter-omics associations and omics-specific patterns, with the adaptive weight allocation. Specifically, multi-view data comprise two components: (i) the integrated omics feature matrix derived from the similarity network fusion strategy and (ii) omics-specific representations from distinct platforms. These inputs are processed through a multi-view information bottleneck clustering framework that leverages cross-view complementarity to enhance representations. View weights are adaptively assigned via maximum entropy regularization, proportional to their information content. The final cell partitions are obtained through sequential iterative optimization. Comprehensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that scAMVIB has strong competitiveness in clustering while maintaining biological interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.