Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527816›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Optimization of Contrast Injection Protocols for Time-Resolved MRA Technique in Dogs: A Comparative Study of Vascular Signal Characteristics and Artifacts.

Sunghwa Hong, Eunji Kim, Junghee Yoon, Jihye Choi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Optimization of Contrast Injection Protocols for Time-Resolved MRA Technique in Dogs: A Comparative Study of Vascular Signal Characteristics and Artifacts.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunghwa HongDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8955-1373
Eunji KimDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3613-7887
Junghee YoonDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2077-763X
Jihye ChoiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1258-7158

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning NRF-2021R1A2C200573011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to optimize magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) protocols for time-resolved MRA imaging in dogs by using different injection rates and contrast volumes. In this experimental and prospective study, four protocols combining two flow rates (0.2 and 2.0 mL/s) and two contrast volumes (0.2 and 0.4 mL/kg, equivalent to 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium) were applied in five healthy beagle dogs. Quantitative measurements, including maximum signal intensity, peak enhancement time, diagnostic window, and signal homogeneity, were obtained for the common carotid artery and external jugular vein. Qualitative assessment included arterial visibility persistence, wall margin clarity, and artifact evaluation. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect size analysis was used to further interpret nonsignificant trends. The low-flow-high-volume protocol (0.2 mL/s, 0.4 mL/kg) yielded the longest diagnostic window and superior vessel visibility with minimal venous contamination, while maintaining comparable maximum signal intensity to higher flow rate protocols. Artifact-related issues such as ringing and intravoxel dephasing were least observed in the low-flow-high-volume protocol. Although high-flow-high-volume protocol showed improved signal homogeneity, it was associated with greater artifact susceptibility. Interobserver agreement ranged from fair to substantial (κ = 0.457-0.681), with greater variability in artifact-related scores. These findings suggest that a slower injection rate with higher contrast volume, as seen in the low-flow-high-volume protocol, provides the best balance of image quality and diagnostic performance, supporting its recommendation as a preferred protocol for small-animal time-resolved MRA.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAnimalsArtifactsCarotid Artery, CommonDogsFemaleJugular VeinsMaleProspective StudiesContrast Mediaartifactcaninecomputed tomography angiography (CTA)dogmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID41527816
PMCPMC12797109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.