Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527784›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Understanding Experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in General Practice: A Realist Qualitative Study.

Hannah Stott, Alice Berry, Serena Halls, Rachel Thomas, Cathy Liddiard, Justin Jagosh, Fiona Cramp, Margaret Cupples, Paula Kersten, Zoe Anchors and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah StottUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Alice BerryUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3863-6835
Serena HallsUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-8255
Rachel ThomasUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3726-5179
Cathy LiddiardUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-1866
Justin JagoshCentre for Advancement in Realist Evaluation and Synthesis, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-2957
Fiona CrampUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-9758
Margaret CupplesQueen's University Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4248-9700
Paula KerstenUniversity of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-0442
Zoe AnchorsUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-2334
Peter WilliamsUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-0564
Heather GageUniversity of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Dave FosterPatient Research Partner, Bristol, UK.
Nicola E WalshUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0499-4829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First Contact Physiotherapy Practitioners (FCPPs) are working across the UK to deliver musculoskeletal services to patients within general practice. Little is known about the impact of the model and how variation in delivery may lead to different experiences and outcomes of the service amongst patients and general practice staff. This study explored staff and patient experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in general practice to determine what works, for whom, under what circumstances, and how. Qualitative interviews were conducted in general practice sites across Great Britain. Interviews were based on initial programme theories identified in an earlier realist review and consensus event. We conducted 80 remote interviews with practice staff and patients, and a further 3 interviews with respondents with other roles related to First Contact Physiotherapy provision. All interviews were analysed using a realist approach. Seven overarching theory areas were identified: 1. Awareness of FCPPs; 2. Communication and integration into practice; 3. FCPP approach in primary care; 4. FCPP additional qualifications; 5. Practice workload; 6. FCPP personal development; and 7. Employment models of FCPP. Three key areas were identified as integral to successful service delivery and implementation: FCPP integration; skillset and impact on resource use; and employment model. Findings from this study strengthen the evidence by providing a robust piece of empirical work about the key issues and contexts impacting successful implementation of the FCPP role into general practice, which will aid decision makers when developing First Contact Physiotherapy services.

Indexed as

General PracticeMusculoskeletal DiseasesPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomFirst Contact physiotherapygeneral practiceprimary carerealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41527784
PMCPMC12800008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.