Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527778›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2026

Expanding the Differential Diagnosis of Ultrasonographic Flexor Digitorum Profundus-Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Dissociation of Echogenicity: Muscular Dystrophies.

Anson W Wilks, Nizar Chahin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anson W WilksDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Nizar ChahinDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsDissociation of echogenicity of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) on neuromuscular ultrasound has been reported to be a useful sign to differentiate inclusion body myositis (IBM) from more common disease mimics, but it is not clear that this finding is pathognomonic of IBM. Our study aimed to evaluate whether this sign may be present in certain muscular dystrophies.

methodsThis case series included 6 genetically confirmed muscular dystrophy patients (2 Becker muscular dystrophy [BMD], 2 myotonic dystrophy type 2 [DM2], 1 myotonic dystrophy type 1 [DM1], and 1 facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 [FSHD1]), whose clinical picture was notable for selective deep finger flexor weakness. Neuromuscular ultrasound had been used to image the proximal medial forearm, where echointensity (EI) of the FDP and FCU was visually graded according to the Heckmatt scale and an FDP/FCU EI ratio was generated from quantitative grayscale analysis.

resultsThe FDP had a higher EI-by Heckmatt grade and quantitative grayscale-than the FCU in all 6 patients, indicating preferential ultrasonographic involvement of the FDP in these muscular dystrophy cases. DISCUSSION: Ultrasonographic FDP-FCU dissociation of echogenicity confirms selective deep finger flexor involvement. The differential diagnosis of this imaging sign includes IBM but also certain muscular dystrophies (BMD, DM1, DM2, and FSHD), which should be considered in uncommon presentations of suspected IBM or when additional supportive diagnostic findings thereof are lacking.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalMuscular DystrophiesAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleForearmHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyositis, Inclusion BodyUltrasonographydiagnosisFDP‐FCU dissociation of echogenicityinclusion body myositismuscular dystrophiesneuromuscular ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41527778
PMCPMC12888829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.