ReviewNursing open2026
Summary of Evidence for Perioperative Management of Day Surgery Patients Undergoing Anorectal Surgery.
Review in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis scoping review aimed to map and synthesise the available evidence on the perioperative management of patients undergoing anorectal surgery in a day-surgery setting. This study creates the first unified, evidence-based framework for day-surgery anorectal care. It addresses gaps by integrating existing recommendations and establishing new protocols for positioning and postoperative care (diet, activity, bowels) tailored for rapid discharge. By standardising workflows for the day-surgery setting, it aims to reduce complications and unplanned admissions.
designA scoping review methodology was employed.
methodsA systematic search of relevant literature was conducted across 25 databases guided by the '6S' model of evidence-based resources. Two reviewers, trained in evidence-based systems, independently performed study selection. A rigorous quality assessment process was applied to all included studies, followed by a detailed extraction, refinement and integration of the evidence.
resultsA total of 8 studies were included, comprising 2 clinical decision aids, 3 guidelines and 3 expert consensuses. We summarised 45 pieces of best evidence across six areas: preoperative education, preoperative assessment, preoperative preparation, intraoperative management, postoperative management and discharge management. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: It will increase the quality of care provided by nurses and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.