Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527662›Full record

ArticleProceedings. International Conference on Image Processing2025

SPARSITY-DRIVEN PARALLEL IMAGING CONSISTENCY FOR IMPROVED SELF-SUPERVISED MRI RECONSTRUCTION.

Yaşar Utku Alçalar, Mehmet Akçakaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CONSISTENCY MODELS FOR FAST MRI USING REGULARIZATION BY DENOISING.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaşar Utku AlçalarDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Mehmet AkçakayaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Rapid Comprehensive Cardiac MRI Exam for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery DiseaseR01HL153146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI AKCAKAYA, MEHMET · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Robust and Efficient Learning of High-Resolution Brain MRI Reconstruction from Small Referenceless DataR01EB032830 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Mehmet Akcakaya · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153146NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-driven deep learning (PD-DL) models have proven to be a powerful approach for improved reconstruction of rapid MRI scans. In order to train these models in scenarios where fully-sampled reference data is unavailable, self-supervised learning has gained prominence. However, its application at high acceleration rates frequently introduces artifacts, compromising image fidelity. To mitigate this shortcoming, we propose a novel way to train PD-DL networks via carefully-designed perturbations. In particular, we enhance the k-space masking idea of conventional self-supervised learning with a novel consistency term that assesses the model's ability to accurately predict the added perturbations in a sparse domain, leading to more reliable and artifact-free reconstructions. The results obtained from the fastMRI knee and brain datasets show that the proposed training strategy effectively reduces aliasing artifacts and mitigates noise amplification at high acceleration rates, outperforming state-of-the-art self-supervised methods both visually and quantitatively.

Indexed as

Computational imagingfast MRIparallel imagingself-supervised learningsparse methods

Identifiers

PMID41527662
PMCPMC12790888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.