ArticleCureus2025
Case Report of Overlapping Pubic Symphysis Dislocation Managed Nonoperatively.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overlapping pubic symphysis dislocation (OPSD) is a rare form of pelvic injury typically caused by high-energy lateral compression forces, resulting in the entrapment of the pubic body against or behind the contralateral pubic ramus. The majority of reported cases have required open reduction and internal fixation due to the mechanical complexity of the injury. However, less invasive management strategies may be feasible in select cases. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with diabetes who sustained an OPSD associated with a right sacral ala fracture, along with multiple nondisplaced rib and lumbar spine fractures, following blunt trauma. Urological evaluation, including CT urogram and ascending urethrogram, confirmed no bladder or urethral injury. Given the absence of posterior instability and urethral injury, this specific patient was managed conservatively under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic guidance. Manual reduction was successfully performed using a flexion, abduction, and external rotation maneuver of both hips, with anterior pressure on the symphysis. The patient was instructed to perform non-weight-bearing mobilization for six weeks, followed by gradual mobilization. Follow-up imaging confirmed a maintained reduction without signs of pelvic instability or urological complications. This case demonstrates that closed manual reduction can be a viable alternative to surgical intervention in selected cases of OPSD, particularly when there is no associated urethral injury or complex posterior pelvic ring disruption. Early recognition, appropriate imaging, skilled reduction under anesthesia, and maintained reduction at 18 weeks with no complications are critical in achieving favorable outcomes while minimizing surgical morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.