ArticleCureus2025
Restoration of Sagittal Alignment as a Key Factor in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Postoperative Balanced and Imbalanced Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The current consensus for treating sagittal imbalance in degenerative spine disease supports deformity correction. However, there is a growing trend toward limited fusion, particularly in patients presenting predominantly with leg symptoms. The present study aimed to compare radiological and clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion between patients with postoperative sagittal balance and those with residual imbalance. Methods This study included 270 patients who underwent limited lumbar arthrodesis and were followed for two years. Radiological parameters-sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS)-were recorded preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative sagittal alignment: balanced (SVA < 50 mm) and imbalanced (SVA > 50 mm). Both intragroup pre- and postoperative improvements and intergroup differences in outcomes were analyzed. Results Out of 270 patients, 194 had good sagittal alignment and 76 had sagittal imbalance (SVA > 50 mm). Both groups showed significant postoperative (two-year follow-up) improvement in quality-of-life scores (VAS, ODI, and SF-36) compared with baseline values (p < 0.001). However, when comparing the degree of improvement between the balanced and imbalanced groups, no statistically significant differences were observed. A significant but weak negative correlation was noted between the change in the VAS score and the socioeconomic status in patients with sagittal imbalance of the spine. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, limited lumbar fusion can achieve favorable short-term outcomes irrespective of postoperative sagittal alignment. These findings suggest that extensive deformity correction may not always be necessary in degenerative cases presenting primarily with leg symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.