ArticleHealth science reports2026
Understanding a Complex Intervention to Reduce Unplanned Hospitalizations From Nursing Homes: Process Evaluation of INTERCARE.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable improvement of interprofessional care for better resident outcomes: protocol for the INTERSCALE hybrid type III effectiveness cluster-randomized trial comparing individualized and collaborative delivery of an evidence-based care model for long-term care.Implementation science : IS · 2026Trial
- Understanding a Complex Intervention to Reduce Unplanned Hospitalizations From Nursing Homes: Process Evaluation of INTERCARE.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The INTERCARE study aimed to reduce unplanned hospitalizations in Swiss nursing homes (NH) by implementing a complex nurse-led model featuring nurses with in-depth geriatric training (INTERCARE nurse). To optimize the intervention for scale-up, this process evaluation aims to describe the intervention elements' use in practice, to explore related barriers and facilitators, and to explore the mechanisms of change. Methods: The process evaluation was conducted alongside the INTERCARE study guided by the Medical Research Council's framework. We combined qualitative data from participating NHs via individual interviews and focus groups with care workers, INTERCARE nurses and physicians. Additionally, structured notes from meetings with NH leadership teams were included. For each intervention element, data were compiled into a spreadsheet, followed by inductive coding. Changes reported by NHs related to the intervention were summarized and consolidated in a conceptual model. Results: Our analysis revealed two groups of intervention mechanisms: (1) those changing care workers' reasoning, for example, following a more structured approach to perform tasks (e.g., with the help of evidence-based instruments) and (2) those enabling existing resources, for example, availability of a responsible contact person (i.e., the INTERCARE nurse). We further identified behavior changes in care workers, including faster reaction to changes in resident situations, more comprehensive assessment of resident situations and improved communication, which contributed to the reduction of hospitalizations. Conclusions: Understanding how interventions work in practice is crucial to inform potential adaptations to complex interventions. We found interprofessional collaboration supported by evidence-based instruments and the INTERCARE nurse to be key elements to drive the reduction of unplanned hospitalization, together with the use of ACP. The findings can help not only to optimize the intervention elements for scale-up, but also hold implications for refining alternative care models, ultimately reducing unplanned hospitalizations in NH residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.