Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527558›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

The Science of Pseudoaccommodation and Its Therapeutic Potential.

Jakub Poliński, Dorota Walasik-Szemplińska, Janusz Skrzypecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakub PolińskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-4565-8306
Dorota Walasik-SzemplińskaSensor Cliniq, Warsaw, Poland.
Janusz SkrzypeckiSensor Cliniq, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-163X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoaccommodation is a critical yet often underappreciated factor influencing visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Despite the irreversible loss of true accommodation due to presbyopia or intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, many patients retain meaningful near and intermediate vision-a phenomenon driven by optical and anatomical contributors such as pupil size, astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations. This functional benefit, known as pseudoaccommodation, can be further enhanced pharmacologically through miotic agents like pilocarpine or surgically via multifocal and extended depth-of-field (EDOF) IOLs. However, these strategies may come with trade-offs, including dysphotopsia and reduced contrast sensitivity. Understanding the mechanisms and limitations of pseudoaccommodation is essential for optimizing IOL selection, managing patient expectations, and improving satisfaction. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current evidence on the anatomical, optical, pharmacologic, and technological factors that contribute to pseudoaccommodation, offering practical guidance for counseling both phakic and pseudophakic presbyopic patients.

Indexed as

optical systempresbyopiapseudoaccommodation

Identifiers

PMID41527558
PMCPMC12983158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.