SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2026
Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- Trends in Mental Health Diagnoses Among Children and Adolescents Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Large German State.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges to infectious disease management and mental health services (MHS). Service demand and delivery changed due to fear of infection, economic hardships, and the psychological effects of protective measures. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to quantify these impacts on different mental health service settings.
methodsComprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO, focusing on studies published from the initial outbreak of COVID-19, starting in November 2019. Studies were included comparing the utilization of mental health inpatient, emergency department (ED), and outpatient services (including telemedicine and medication prescriptions) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A random-effects model was employed to estimate pooled effects, with study quality assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
resultsAmong 128 studies, significant decreases in utilization were observed during the initial phase of the pandemic for inpatient services (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.85) and ED visits (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.10). Outpatient services showed a similar decline (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.92), while no significant change was found in psychotropic medication prescriptions (RR: 0.90, CI: 0.77 to 1.05). In contrast, telemedicine utilization increased significantly (RR: 7.57, 95% CI: 3.63 to 15.77).
conclusionsThe findings reveal substantial shifts in mental health service utilization during the pandemic, with the largest reductions in inpatient services and significant increases in telemedicine use. These results emphasize the need for flexible healthcare models. Further research is essential to evaluate the consequences of reduced MHS utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.