Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527393›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2026

Surface wear and roughness of experimental composites containing calcium orthophosphate particles following toothbrush abrasion.

Handially S Vilela, Mariana C A Resende, Leticia O Sakae, Amanda L Campos, Tais Scaramucci, Roberto R Braga

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Handially S VilelaDepartment of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2696-9154
Mariana C A ResendeDepartment of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-529X
Leticia O SakaeDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3885-4450
Amanda L CamposDepartment of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8970-5944
Tais ScaramucciDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-6697
Roberto R BragaDepartment of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6237-3924

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) 2019/04737-4São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) 2023/18387-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated experimental composites containing dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) particles for toothbrush wear and roughness. Composites containing bisphenol-A glycidyl dimethacrylate/triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with 50 vol% inorganic fraction consisting of barium glass and DCPD (35:15 and 15:35 vol%) or barium glass only were tested alongside a commercial composite (Beautifil II, Shofu) and a glass-ionomer cement (GIC, Fuji Gold Label 9, GC). Surface loss and roughness were quantified after 50,000 and 100,000 cycles using optical profilometry. The specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance/Tukey test. After 50,000 cycles, surface loss was higher for the 35% DCPD composite compared to the experimental control and the GIC. After 100,000 cycles, composites with DCPD presented surface loss not different than the commercial composite but higher than seen for the experimental control and the GIC. Roughness for the composite with 35% DCPD was not different than that of the GIC at baseline, which was higher than seen for the other materials. After 100,000 cycles, roughness for the materials containing DCPD and the GIC were not statistically different. In conclusion, the results suggest that DCPD-containing composites would be better suited for restoration of deciduous teeth and low load-bearing restorations in permanent teeth.

Indexed as

Calcium PhosphatesComposite ResinsToothbrushingBarium CompoundsBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateDental Devices, Home CareDental MaterialsDental Restoration WearGlassGlass Ionomer CementsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsSilicon DioxideSurface PropertiesBarium Compoundsbarium glass fillerBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylatecalcium phosphate, dibasic, dihydrateCalcium PhosphatesComposite ResinsDental MaterialsGlass Ionomer CementsPolyethylene Glycolspolymethacrylic acidPolymethacrylic AcidsSilicon Dioxidetriethylene glycol dimethacrylatecalcium phosphatescomposite resinsdental restoration weardicalcium phosphate dihydrateglass ionomer cement

Identifiers

PMID41527393
PMCPMC12976824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.