ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Pharmacotherapy Risks in Rare Genetic Diseases: Cross-Referencing ACMG Secondary Findings v3.2 List With Clinical Databases.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical genomics and pharmacogenomics have largely remained separate fields, though some genetic variants have overlapping disease risk and drug implications. However, the extent of this overlap is not well studied. To explore this gap, we cross-referenced genes from the American College of Medical Genetics Secondary Findings v3.2 list with genomic databases and drug labeling to identify gene-phenotype pairs with overlapping clinical genomics and pharmacogenomic implications. We searched GeneReviews and PharmGKB (now called ClinPGx) for each gene-phenotype pair and reviewed the FDALabel database contraindications or warnings. Targeted therapies for specific germline/somatic variants were excluded. PGx-trained pharmacists and a genetic counselor classified gene-phenotype pairs into three levels: Level 1 (Food and Drug Administration's or guideline-driven recommendations), Level 2 (potential pharmacotherapy implication), and Level 3 (no/weak interactions). Among 97 gene-phenotype pairs reviewed, 22 (23%) were Level 1, 31 (32%) were Level 2, and 44 (45%) were Level 3. Pharmacotherapy implications included risks inferred by disease pathology (e.g., anticoagulants and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia) and less obvious associations (e.g., Marfan syndrome and fluoroquinolones). Unrecognized medication implications may pose patient safety risks. Greater research, information consolidation and dissemination, and multidisciplinary collaboration among clinical genomics specialists, pharmacogenomic specialists, and other practitioners are essential as genetic testing becomes routine in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.