ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Real-time prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia onset in ICU: development of a dynamic machine learning model.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a preventable complication of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with a significant healthcare impact. Early risk prediction is crucial, but current models lack real-time adaptability. This study develops a real-time VAP prediction model using machine learning and high-resolution EHR data from the MIMIC-III database.
methodsWe analyzed 3523 ICU stays (3204 patients) from MIMIC-III, including adults who received IMV for at least 48 h. VAP was labeled based on microbiological cultures and antibiotic initiation. A real-time ensemble model of XGBoost regressors was developed to predict time to VAP onset, incorporating vital signs, ventilator data, and lab results. Two static classifiers (24 h and 48 h) were also compared.
resultsVAP occurred in 595 ICU stays (16.89%), with an incidence rate of 23.77 per 1000 IMV-days. Median VAP onset was 113.5 h post-IMV. The real-time model outperformed static models with a C-index of 0.68, AUROC of 0.71, and AUPRC of 0.36. It provided a median lead time of 53 h before VAP onset, with key predictors including temperature, respiratory rate, and minute ventilation.
conclusionWe present a real-time VAP prediction model that outperforms static classifiers, providing actionable lead time for proactive microbiological surveillance. The model enables risk stratification for enhanced monitoring and, when clinically indicated, timely targeted antimicrobial therapy. Future work will focus on multicenter prospective validation and integration into ICU workflows to assess clinical utility and impact on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.