ArticleGut pathogens2026
Assessing whether rectal swabs reflect appendiceal microbiota profiles in acute appendicitis: a 16S rRNA-based comparative study.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis is associated with characteristic changes in the intestinal microbiota, but direct sampling of appendiceal contents is invasive and cannot be performed in healthy controls. We therefore evaluated whether rectal swabs could partially capture appendiceal microbiome signatures in adults with acute appendicitis.
methodsIn a prospective cross-sectional study, we enrolled adults with acute appendicitis and healthy volunteers between October 2023 and December 2024. Four types of samples were collected: feces from healthy controls (HC), appendiceal luminal contents from patients with acute appendicitis (AC), intraoperative rectal swabs from patients with acute appendicitis (RS), and initial postoperative feces from patients with acute appendicitis (IF; first stool within 24 h after surgery). 16 S rRNA gene (V3-V4) sequencing was performed, and reads were processed with QIIME2. Alpha and beta diversity, differential taxonomic composition, and PICRUSt2-based functional predictions were compared across matrices. Genus-level and functional concordance between paired AC-RS samples was assessed.
resultsAfter quality control, 64 AC, 34 RS, 24 IF, and 29 HC samples were included. Phylogenetic diversity (PD whole-tree) was higher in AC and RS than HC, with AC also higher than RS; IF showed lower PD than AC. Bray-Curtis principal coordinate analysis showed AC forming a distinct cluster separated from HC and RS along PC1, whereas IF overlapped with HC and RS. AC, RS, and IF were enriched for Escherichia/Shigella and Fusobacterium and depleted in butyrate-producing genera such as Faecalibacterium compared with HC. In the 21 paired AC-RS cases, genus-level relative abundances and several predicted functional pathways showed concordance, indicating that RS captured many but not all appendiceal dysbiosis features.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that intraoperative rectal swabs may partially reflect appendiceal microbiome alterations at the genus and pathway levels and may serve as a minimally invasive adjunct for microbiome profiling in acute appendicitis. However, these associations are inferred from 16 S amplicon data in a modestly sized, antibiotic-exposed cohort and should be validated using shotgun metagenomics in larger, clinically stratified populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.