ArticleBMC nursing2026
Exploring nursing students' self-confidence and perceptions in simulation-based education: a mixed-method approach.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulation-Based CPR Education for Student Nurses: A Narrative Review of Effects on Knowledge, Skills, and Confidence.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-based education (SBE) has emerged as a vital teaching–learning strategy in nursing education, enabling students to practice in realistic but controlled settings. It enhances self-confidence, clinical competence, and positive perceptions toward learning while reducing risks associated with direct patient care.
aimThe present study aimed to assess the self-confidence and perceptions of undergraduate nursing students regarding simulation-based education at a selected nursing college.
methodsA mixed-method research design was employed, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative phase included 80 students selected through purposive sampling, assessed using the NLN Self-Confidence in Learning Scale and the Perception of Simulation-Based Learning Scale before and after structured simulation sessions. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 20 students, analyzed thematically to gain deeper insights. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and correlation analysis.
resultsThe findings revealed a significant improvement in students’ outcomes following simulation-based education. Self-confidence scores increased from 62.35 ± 8.12 to 78.40 ± 7.65, while perception scores improved from 65.10 ± 9.05 to 81.25 ± 8.40, both statistically significant at p < 0.001. A strong positive correlation (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) was observed between self-confidence and perceptions. Thematic analysis generated five themes, including emotional engagement, skill development, confidence enhancement, technological realism, and suggestions for diverse scenarios.
conclusionThe study concludes that simulation-based education significantly enhances nursing students’ confidence, satisfaction, and perceptions. Integration of simulation into nursing curricula is recommended to strengthen clinical preparedness and professional competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.