Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527123›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Medical student learning in the operating room: a qualitative study from the perspectives of students and the OR team.

Cigdem Kanburoglu, Baris Sezer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cigdem KanburogluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Islampasa, Rize, Türkiye. drcigdemkan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-4373
Baris SezerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Altindag/Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-0819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe operating room (OR) is a pivotal setting for medical students, shaping both professional identity and clinical competence. This study explored the expectations and experiences of medical students during their OR training, while also incorporating the perspectives of the surgical team.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using focus groups with OR team members and semi-structured interviews with medical students. Data were analysed using a conventional content analysis approach, with findings organised into higher-order categories to capture shared and divergent perspectives on learning, supervision, and team dynamics.

resultsStudents described how interactions with the OR team, clarity of expectations, and opportunities for participation shaped their learning experiences and professional identity. Orientation was consistently reported as a critical need, and both students and educators supported the development of a self-paced e-learning module to address this gap. While students appreciated supportive supervisors, they also reported that unclear expectations and inconsistent guidance generated stress and uncertainty. Negative behaviours emerged as a barrier to motivation and learning. From the OR team perspective, heavy workload, time pressure, competing clinical priorities and unclear expectations were described as factors influencing educational interactions.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that enhancing orientation processes, attention to role expectations, and supportive interprofessional interactions may influence medical students’ learning experiences in the OR.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateLearningOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterprofessional RelationsQualitative ResearchMedical educationOperating roomSurgical teachingUndergraduate training

Identifiers

PMID41527123
PMCPMC12888313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.