ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
Development of a machine learning-based early prediction model for disease severity in acute pancreatitis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Correlation Analysis of C-Reactive Protein-Triglyceride-Glucose Index with the Severity of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere acute pancreatitis (SAP) represents the most severe form of acute pancreatitis (AP) and is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Early identification of critically ill patients is crucial for disease management in AP. However, commonly used scoring systems are often complex, time-consuming, and lack interpretability. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a machine learning-based model for early prediction of severity in AP and to perform interpretability analysis.
methodsA total of 528 AP patients meeting the inclusion criteria were screened via the hospital electronic medical record system and randomly divided into training and testing sets at a 7:3 ratio. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was employed for variable selection. Four machine learning algorithms, Logistic Regression, extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM), were utilized to construct prediction models. The optimal model was identified by comparing the following metrics between the training and testing sets: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Kappa value, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. In addition, the calibration curve and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) within the testing set were evaluated. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to interpret the selected model.
resultsComparative evaluation of the machine learning models revealed that the SVM model demonstrated the best overall performance. The SVM model achieved an AUC = 0.819, Kappa = 0.509, accuracy = 0.861, sensitivity = 0.615, specificity = 0.909, PPV = 0.571, NPV = 0.923, and F1 score = 0.593 on the testing set, respectively. SHAP analysis indicated that AP severity increased with higher SHAP values. Elevated levels of the Simple Prognostic Score (SPS), respiratory rate, and High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), along with the presence of peritoneal effusion, were associated with the occurrence of SAP.
conclusionsThe developed SVM model shows promising potential for distinguishing AP severity levels. It holds significant clinical utility, particularly for its high effectiveness in excluding non-SAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.