ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Food taboos and other cultural taboos in history of miscarriage: a hospital-based study from India.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCulture has an important influence on taboos during pregnancy with respect to food and other cultural practices in order to protect the pregnancy from any adversities. However, these dietary restrictions during pregnancy which consequently result in depletion of important micronutrients may be implicated in miscarriages. This study aimed to document the taboos, their cultural contexts and the association with miscarriage in light of maternal nutritional indicators (homocysteine, folate and vitamin B12).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among the 822 pregnant women attending Antenatal care clinic at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College. Data on socio-demographic, reproductive profile and anthropometric variables were collected using standard techniques. Data pertaining to food and other cultural taboos were collected using semi-structured questionnaire. Blood samples (5mL) were collected from all participants for estimation of biochemical variables. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.
resultsThe prevalence of food taboo and other cultural taboos was observed in 83.9% and 53.3% of the recruited pregnant women, respectively. Ten categories of food items and other cultural taboos were observed and documented with their respective reasons behind following the taboo. Participants who did not practise food taboos and those who practised other cultural taboos showed significant increased risk for miscarriage. Further, practicing food taboos was seen to pose significant increased risk for low vitamin B12 and high homocysteine.
conclusionThe present study highlights the role of food taboos and other cultural taboos in maternal health in India. Although the traditional knowledge of taboos play a protective role in miscarriage, they seem to be causing risk for micronutrient deficiencies in pregnant women. This warrants careful dietary counselling during ANC visits, keeping in view the strong cultural contexts of practicing taboos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.