Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41527051›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

End-to-end deep learning framework for automated angle estimation in hallux valgus from full-field weight-bearing radiographs.

Qiong Wang, Jun-Hu Wang, Yan Zhang, Pei-Long Liu, Jie Wang, Jian-Bo Sun, Hong-Mou Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiong WangFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Hu WangFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Yan ZhangFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Pei-Long LiuFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Jie WangFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Bo SunFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Mou ZhaoFoot and Ankle Surgery Department, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 710054, People's Republic of China. zhao_hongmou@hotmail.com.

Funding

Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project No. 2025JC-YBMS-927Xi'an Municipal Health Commission Project No. 2025ms10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fully automated, end-to-end deep learning framework was developed and validated for accurate and reliable estimation of the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) from full-field weight-bearing foot radiographs. The framework combines a YOLOv11m-based foot detection module and a trainable module integrating segmentation and principal component analysis (PCA)-based angle estimation, enabling end-to-end training and inference. A retrospective dataset of 1,753 radiographs from 1,652 patients was used for model development and internal validation, while an external dataset of 121 radiographs was used to assess generalizability. Model performance was evaluated against expert manual annotations using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). The YOLOv11m module achieved near-perfect detection on both internal and external datasets. On the internal test dataset, the PCA-based model showed excellent agreement with manual measurements for HVA (r = 0.97, MAE = 1.98°, RMSE = 2.74°) and IMA (r = 0.93, MAE = 1.21°, RMSE = 1.52°). On the external dataset, performance remained robust for both HVA (r = 0.95, MAE = 2.27°, RMSE = 2.82°) and IMA (r = 0.87, MAE = 1.76°, RMSE = 2.13°). On the internal test dataset, 94.89% of HVA and 94.40% of IMA predictions, and on the external test dataset, 93.39% of HVA and 85.95% of IMA predictions fell within predefined clinically acceptable error margins (± 5° for HVA and ± 3° for IMA). The model processed each foot image in 6.3 s, achieving a 24–35 times speed-up over manual measurement. This study demonstrates the feasibility and clinical utility of an end-to-end deep learning framework for fast and accurate angle estimation in hallux valgus using full-field weight-bearing radiographs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHallux ValgusRadiographyHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesWeight-BearingAngle estimationDeep learningHallux valgusHallux valgus angle

Identifiers

PMID41527051
PMCPMC12888486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.