ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Abdominal fat volume predicts bone mass reduction in women with metabolic syndrome: an energy spectral CT analysis.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMetabolic syndrome (MetS) presents significant health risks, but studies on individual component of MetS or its combined impact on bone mass have shown conflicting results. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between abdominal fat and bone mineral density (BMD) in women with MetS using gemstone spectral imaging (GSI).
methodsA retrospective study was performed on 76 women with MetS scheduled for sleeve gastrectomy between June and November 2021. Based on cluster analysis of BMD parameters, the patients were categorized into the high (54) and low (22) BMD groups. Clinical, BMD, and body composition metrics were analyzed separately. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate patients' clinical and body composition parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal diagnostic thresholds of various parameters for diagnosing the high and low BMD groups. Furthermore, taking lumbar vertebral BMD as the dependent variable, multiple linear regression analysis was performed.
resultsSignificant differences in body composition were observed between the high and low BMD groups, with lower abdominal fat in patients in the high BMD group. The ROC curves showed a total abdominal fat volume threshold of 4733.2mL for predicting BMD (P = 0.008). Furthermore, using multiple linear regression adjusted for age, a statistically significant negative correlation was observed between the lumbar vertebral BMD and abdominal fat volume.
conclusionAbdominal fat volume influenced the GSI-BMD in women with MetS. As the abdominal fat increased, the patients' GSI-BMD in the lumbar spine also decreased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.