ArticleGenome biology2026
SDrecall: a sensitive approach for variant detection in segmental duplications.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SDrecall: a sensitive approach for variant detection in segmental duplications.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variant calling in segmental duplications is challenging for short-read sequencing because of ambiguous read origins. We present SDrecall, a method for sensitive variant detection in these regions. Upon constructing a network of homologous sequences, SDrecall realigns reads to each segmental duplication from its homologous counterparts. Realignments are phased and assembled into haplotypes via graph-based algorithms, followed by integer linear programming to retain the two most plausible haplotypes. Tested against long-read benchmarks, SDrecall achieved 95% sensitivity, while maintaining manageable false positives for short variants. SDrecall thus offers significant value for molecular diagnosis in terms of causal mutation detection within homologous regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.