ArticleBMC medicine2026
The clinical landscape of POLE-mutant colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world outcome.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathogenic mutations in the POLE gene disrupt its proofreading function during DNA replication, causing an accumulation of erroneous nucleotide incorporations. This defect leads to a significantly elevated tumor mutation burden (TMB) and increased generation of tumor neoantigens. These molecular characteristics suggest a potential association between POLE-mutant tumors and distinct prognostic outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, clinical evidence supporting this correlation remains limited.
methodsWe retrospectively collected a cohort of CRC patients harboring pathogenic POLE mutations. Comparative analyses were performed between POLE-mutant and POLE wild-type CRCs regarding their clinical characteristics, prognostic outcomes, and genomic profiles. Additionally, we evaluated the response to immunotherapy in metastatic POLE-mutant CRC cases.
resultsAmong 35,108 CRC patients, pathogenic POLE mutations were identified in 261 individuals, accounting for 0.74% of the cohort. The median age at diagnosis for POLE-mutant patients was 48 years, with a male predominance (74.4%) and a substantial proportion (50.4%) of tumors localized in the right-sided colon. All patients with pathogenic POLE mutations exhibited hypermutated phenotypes, characterized by a median TMB of 235.26 mutations per megabase (range: 71.20-719.00 mutations/Mb). In stage II CRC, POLE mutations were significantly associated with a reduced risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.344, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.157-0.754, p = 0.008) when compared to POLE wild-type, microsatellite stable CRC patients. However, this association was not evident in stage III patients (HR 1.004, 95% CI 0.490-2.057, p = 0.992). Importantly, the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment regimens significantly improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.247, 95% CI 0.117-0.552, p = 0.0002) and overall survival (HR = 0.317, 95% CI 0.103-1.143, p = 0.0832) in metastatic CRC patients with pathogenic POLE mutations.
conclusionsPathogenic POLE-mutant CRC constitutes a relatively rare, yet clinically important, subtype. These cancers exhibit distinct clinicopathological and genomic features. Our results indicate that mutations in the POLE gene may serve as a valuable prognostic marker and a potential indicator of benefit to immunotherapy in CRC, offering promising avenues for personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.