Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41526920›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Accurate and efficient data-driven psychiatric assessment using machine learning.

Kseniia Konishcheva, Bennett L Leventhal, Maki Koyama, Sambit Panda, Joshua T Vogelstein, Michael P Milham, Ariel B Lindner, Arno Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kseniia KonishchevaUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France; Learning Planet Institute, Paris, France.
Bennett L LeventhalUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Maki KoyamaChild Mind Institute, NY, NY, USA.
Sambit PandaInstitute for Computational Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joshua T VogelsteinInstitute for Computational Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael P MilhamChild Mind Institute, NY, NY, USA.
Ariel B Lindner *Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Learning Planet Institute, Paris, France.
Arno Klein *Child Mind Institute, NY, NY, USA. arno.klein@childmind.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of mental disorders and learning disabilities is essential for timely intervention. Machine learning and feature selection techniques have potential for improving the accuracy and efficiency of mental health assessments. However, limited research has explored the use of large transdiagnostic datasets, as well as the application of these techniques in developing quick, briefer, question-based assessments. This study applies machine learning and feature selection techniques to a large transdiagnostic dataset featuring a high number of assessment items, and to create a tool for construction of streamlined, efficient, and effective assessments from existing data.

methodsUsing the Healthy Brain Network dataset (n = 4,136 at the time this study was conducted) containing over 1000 questionnaire items, a two-stage feature selection approach, with Elastic Net models, was used to identify optimal, parsimonious item subsets for assessing various disorders and symptoms, as well as custom test-based outcome measures for learning disabilities. The study then compared model performance to existing assessments through rigorous cross-validation.

resultsMachine learning models using parsimonious item subsets significantly outperformed traditional assessments (p = 0.004). Models for specific learning disorders achieved AUC values up to 0.855. Importantly, restricting analysis to non-proprietary assessment items did not significantly reduce performance. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using existing datasets to create efficient, effective assessment tools for mental disorders and learning disabilities. Our open-source, modular software architecture facilitates adaptation to diverse datasets, though external validation remains necessary before clinical implementation. The ability to achieve strong performance using only non-proprietary items supports the development of accessible assessment tools.

Indexed as

Learning DisabilitiesMachine LearningMental DisordersHumansPredictive Learning ModelsFeature selectionHealthy brain network studyLearning disabilitiesLearning disability assessmentMachine learningMental health assessmentPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID41526920
PMCPMC12888633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.