ArticleBMC medical education2026
Residents' and preceptors' perceptions on newly introduced milestones-a qualitative study in general practice/family medicine in Finland.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of competency-based postgraduate education, professional progression is often tracked through milestones, particularly in North American settings. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of residents and preceptors regarding newly implemented milestones in self-assessment and formative assessment within Finland's 6-year national postgraduate education (PGE) program for family medicine/general practice.
methodWe conducted a qualitative study involving preceptors and residents participating in a nationwide 1-year pilot study that utilized a mobile application for milestone tracking. All five universities responsible for PGE recruited a total of 35 preceptors and 36 residents for the study, which began in April 2022. Participants for the focus group interviews were recruited via email from those study participants still involved in training or serving as preceptors between late 2022 and March 2023. Subsequently, six preceptors and six residents participated in semi-structured interviews, conducted in groups of three participants each. The interviews were conducted separately for preceptors and residents. We employed a constructionist approach and used inductive thematic analysis to examine the data from a sociocultural perspective.
resultsWe identified six major themes reflecting perceptions from both groups: 1) Enhancing goal orientation, 2) Facilitation of supervisory meetings, 3) Milestones document as a tool, 4) Support in assessment, 5) Variability in the search for the zone of proximal development, and 6) Provocation of emotions. The major theme of 'enhancing goal orientation' including the subthemes, was perceived similarly across the groups. However, we found differing emphases in 14 out of 22 subthemes.
conclusionsThe study provided insights into previously unexplored themes, including the emotional impact of milestones, the role of supervisory meetings, and variability in strategies for searching for the zone of proximal development. Other themes we identified, such as enhancing goal orientation, milestone documentation, and support in assessment, aligned with existing literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.