ArticleRespiratory research2026
Lung capacity is a determinant of cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is growing evidence suggesting that lung capacity is associated with risk of cardiometabolic disease. However, most studies rely on spirometric measures of lung capacity and self-reported cardiometabolic disease. We aimed to investigate the association of total lung capacity (TLC) with cardiometabolic disease defined using ICD-10 codes.
methodsData from adult patients referred to Cambridge University Hospitals between 2016 and 2024 were used if spirometry, single breath gas transfer, and body plethysmography were performed in the same session. GLI reference equations were used to generate z-scores for lung function measures. ICD-10 codes for cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes were extracted from medical records. We used multi-level (mixed-effects) Cox regression analysis to investigate the association between lung function measurements and incident cardiometabolic disease.
results5628 patients were included, 51% were female, with a median age of 62 (IQR 50–70) years. 60% reported a smoking history. Mean follow-up time was 5.7 (SD 2.3) years, during which time 5% received a cardiovascular disease code, 7% a hypertension code, and 3% a diabetes code. A 1-unit increment in TLC z-score was associated with a 12% lower risk of cardiovascular disease (HR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.80–0.97) later in life. The same was seen for FVC (HR: 0.88, 95%CI 0.77–0.99) but not FEV1/FVC or DLCO. A larger TLC was also associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction. We found no association of lung function measures with incident hypertension or diabetes.
conclusionLung capacity is a determinant for cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction, with larger lungs being protective. TLC and FVC should be considered by clinicians along with other factors, when evaluating a person’s risk of cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.