ArticleBMC public health2026
The prospective relationship between uptake of earned income tax credit (EITC), financial strain, and health in socio-economically strained families of Arab-American descent.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe federal government offers Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) to working low and middle-income families. Lack of knowledge and distrust in government results in a large proportion of qualified families not claiming EITC. This is especially true for minority groups, including immigrants. The study objectives were: (1) to examine whether a community derived EITC outreach campaign targeting EITC eligible residents of Arab-American descent in Southeast Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A., resulted in increased knowledge of EITC; (2) to study the prospective relationship between EITC knowledge and financial hardship; and (3) to study the relationship between risks (financial hardship) and protective (exercise) factors and self-rated health.
methodsIn 2021, a total of 215 women attending Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) centers in Southeast Detroit, Michigan, were recruited. Participants filled out a survey at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months, respectively. The survey contained questions on sociodemographics, financial stressors, exercise, health, and knowledge of EITC. The 1-year retention rate was 48% (n = 104).
resultsAt baseline, knowledge about EITC was low (mean 1.1 [SE 0.3] on a 0–10 visual analogue scale) but increased significantly during the first six months (2.9 [0.3]; p < .01). Knowledge of EITC was not related to financial hardship ratings. Approximately 38% of respondents worried about not having sufficient funds to pay for rent/mortgage at baseline, and 28% worried about not being able to buy nutritious meals for their families. Worry about paying for meals at the 6-month study mid-point was significantly related to self-rated health at 12 months (p = .013). Self-rated health at 12 months was significantly lower (-0.74; 95% confidence interval − 1.40, − 0.16) among those worrying about paying for meals. The model explained 5.6% (r2 = 0.056) of the variance in self-rated health at 12-months.
conclusionsThe study shows that knowledge about EITC is limited among qualified Arab-American households. A community engaged EITC outreach campaign increased knowledge substantially. Financial strain is related to worsening self-rated health. EITC is an underused bipartisan, pro-employment supported federal program to address near-poverty and poverty among underserved families. Future studies should determine whether EITC outreach campaigns increase the actual uptake of EITC, and whether increased uptake results in improved health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.