ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Facilitators and barriers to implementation of obstetric ultrasound scanning intervention by midwives within maternal and child health departments of the selected healthcare facilities in four districts of Zambia: experiences of healthcare workers.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Zambia's maternal and child health departments, midwives offer compulsory and free obstetric ultrasound scans during antenatal care (ANC). These scans monitor fetal growth and development and identify any possible pregnancy-related complications or abnormalities. However, the normalization of obstetric ultrasound scans (USS) by midwives in Zambia is still in progress. The study sought to assess the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of obstetric ultrasound scans by midwives during antenatal care within 11 healthcare facilities in Zambia: experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs).
methodsThis was an explorative qualitative study with 28 healthcare workers from 11 healthcare facilities in four districts of Zambia. In-depth interviews were conducted in English, guided by an interview guide. The interviews were recorded with audio recorders, transcribed in verbatim, coded with Nvivo version 12, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
resultsHealthcare workers highlighted that pregnant women who accessed ultrasound scans during antenatal care within maternal and child health departments were more inclined to follow through with their ANC appointments. The availability of free ultrasound scans encouraged pregnant women to accept and utilize these services, leading to enhanced quality of ANC care provided by healthcare workers. Obstetric ultrasounds during ANC expedited decision-making processes about specialized pregnancy care by midwives. The main facility barriers were inadequate space in maternal and child health departments, heightened workloads for midwives leading to burnout, and lengthy waiting queues that discouraged pregnant women from utilizing ultrasound scan services.
conclusionThe study underscores the significance of obstetric ultrasound scans in improving antenatal care within Zambia's healthcare facilities. Recommendations include prioritizing infrastructure upgrades to accommodate ultrasound services within MCH, implementing workload management strategies for midwives, and reducing waiting times for pregnant women to access the service. Furthermore, providing continuous training and support for midwives in ultrasound scanning technology will enhance the delivery of quality and normalisation of antenatal care in Zambia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.