ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
MRI-based deep learning and radiomics for severity classification of pediatric venous malformations.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous malformations (VMs) are the most common congenital vascular malformations and exhibit high clinical heterogeneity. Current severity assessments heavily rely on subjective imaging interpretation and invasive angiography, which are limited by inconsistency and lack of standardization. Therefore, there is an urgent need for objective, quantitative, and automated tools to evaluate VM severity.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 211 pediatric patients with peripheral VMs from a single center. Severity was defined by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) classification and dichotomized into localized/limited lesions (Types I–III) and diffuse/ectatic lesions (Type IV). All patients underwent routine MRI, and the proposed models were developed using T2 fat-suppressed (T2-FS) images. Radiomics features and deep learning–derived features were extracted and selected using the training cohort only and subsequently integrated with clinical variables to construct multiple classification models. The dataset was randomly divided into training and independent test cohorts. Performance was evaluated by ROC analysis, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM.
resultsWhile univariate logistic regression revealed that coagulation parameters and lesion characteristics were associated with severity, only thrombin time remained significant in multivariate analysis. For imaging-based models, the deep learning–radiomics (DLR) model achieved an AUC of 0.990 in the training cohort and 0.957 in the independent test cohort. The combined model integrating clinical and imaging features achieved an AUC of 0.800 with an accuracy of 82.4% in the test cohort. DCA confirmed its superior net clinical benefit.
conclusionWe developed and internally validated an MRI-based deep learning and radiomics framework using routine T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI for automated severity classification of venous malformations. The model demonstrated competitive and interpretable performance and may serve as a supportive decision-assistance approach pending further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.