Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41526835›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Transfer learning with Bayesian optimization for colorectal cancer histopathology classification.

Houda Saif ALGhafri, Chia S Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Houda Saif ALGhafriDepartment of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Muscat, 133, Sultanate of Oman. houda.alghafri@utas.edu.om.
Chia S LimGraduate School of Technology, Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated colorectal cancer (CRC) histopathology classification remains challenging due to variations in datasets, staining conditions, and tissue morphology across institutions. Many prior studies apply standard CNN architectures with fixed hyperparameters, leaving limited examination of how model choice and optimization strategies affect performance robustness across heterogeneous CRC data.

methodsWe evaluate eight transfer learning models on three-class CRC datasets and propose CRC-BayTune, applying Bayesian optimization to tune key training parameters, including learning rate, batch size, with fine-tuning depth. All models are assessed in patch-level experimental settings, and statistical significance is quantified using Friedman tests, repeated-measures ANOVA, and post hoc analyses. Robustness is assessed by introducing controlled Gaussian noise perturbations. Grad-CAM provides qualitative visual explanations by highlighting regions that contribute to model predictions.

resultsDenseNet201, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, and ResNet50V2 achieved the highest median MCC values of 0.984, 0.982, 0.975, and 0.983, respectively. Statistical analysis confirms that both model architecture ([Formula: see text], Friedman) and hyperparameter configuration ([Formula: see text], RM-ANOVA) significantly affect performance. Models with deeper feature hierarchies demonstrated more stable convergence and smaller accuracy degradation under noise.

conclusionThe results show that systematic hyperparameter tuning can improve the training stability and classification performance of standard CNN models compared with fixed configurations in CRC histopathology tasks. The findings underscore that model performance in this setting is sensitive to choices such as learning rate, batch size, and fine-tuning depth, and that evaluating these factors explicitly can support more reliable use of deep learning models in computational pathology.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsTransfer Machine LearningBayes TheoremClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansBayesian optimizationColorectal cancerHistopathology imagesTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41526835
PMCPMC12888672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.