ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
Concentration response analyses for QT data with several active compounds.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PK-QTc analyses are routinely done as part of most drug development programs. Usually, the PK concentration of a single compound is related to the QTc effect. However, in many instances there are several active compounds, for example a parent drug and its metabolite, or combination drugs. Previous authors have shown that doing separate PK-QTc analyses for each of the potentially active compounds may lead to biased results, and recommended to do joint modeling of the impact of both compounds on the corrected QT interval. In this paper we go one step further and propose a formal hypothesis test to exclude a [Formula: see text]msec effect based on a joint modeling approach when there are potentially two active compounds. In analogy to the situation with just one active compound, where the upper limit of a [Formula: see text]% confidence interval for [Formula: see text] (with [Formula: see text] being the slope of a linear exposure-response relationship and [Formula: see text] being the expected maximum concentration of some supra-therapeutic dose) needs to be below [Formula: see text]msec, we use the upper confidence intervals for [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] and exclude a [Formula: see text]msec effect if all three upper confidence limits are below the [Formula: see text]msec threshold. We propose a bootstrap approach for decision making, and show via simulations that this approach controls the type I error of [Formula: see text]%. We focus on the situation where exposure-response is linear in both compounds, but also indicate how this can be extended to non-linear situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.