ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Vibration perception threshold assessments: Comparing the Staircase and von Békésy methods.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibration perception thresholds (VPTs) are used in fields like health, work, and traffic safety. To assess them, international standards recommend two psychophysical methodologies: the von Békésy method, or variants of the up and down algorithm, for example, the Staircase method. However, their impact on the results of threshold measurement has not been explored much, including on assessments at frequencies > 250 Hz. Thus, this study compared VPT results obtained by the two methods to determine what differences could be found between them. Using the Staircase (3 Down/1 Up rule) and von Békésy methods, VPT assessments were conducted at the pulp of the right index and ring fingers of 30 healthy subjects, at vibration frequencies of 250 Hz, 375 Hz, and 500 Hz. Analysis revealed significant differences between the mean VPTs across the three frequencies, regardless of method (VPTs increasing as frequency increased). Significant differences were also found between results from both methods (lower thresholds with Staircase). Significant differences were further found between VPT results assessed at the index and ring fingers (lower on the latter). However, this was only verified in results obtained using the Staircase. These findings highlight the importance of method selection during experimental design and when interpreting or comparing findings between studies using different VPT assessment techniques. All data related to the study presented in this paper is available at the Open Science Framework (OSF), at the following URL: https://osf.io/3uqsb/overview?view_only=03e228c15a274cb781045e3b61ccb052 . This study was not preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.