ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluating Large Language Models as Medical Consultation Tools for Double Eyelid Surgery: A Cross-Language Study in English and Chinese.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDouble eyelid surgery is a common cosmetic procedure that creates a crease in the upper eyelid. Due to insufficient understanding of the procedure, numerous consultations have emerged, placing a heavy burden on plastic surgeons. The rise of large language models (LLMs) offers a potential solution to this issue.
methodsThis study collected sixteen questions commonly of concern to individuals seeking the surgery via an online questionnaire and assessed the efficacy of fifteen popular LLMs in answering these questions with both English and Chinese inputs. All responses from the LLMs were scored multidimensionally by three expert eyelid plastic surgeons across dimensions including professionalism, patient friendliness, informativeness, practicality, and logical clarity. The scoring results were statistically analyzed using the Friedman test and Nemenyi post-hoc test.
resultsWith English input, ERNIE-Bot, ChatGPT-4o, and Gemini-2.0-Flash consistently ranked among the top three across most evaluation dimensions. In contrast, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, HuatuoGPT, ZoeGPT, CompliantGPT, and BastionGPT ranked lower across all dimensions, with performance significantly lagging behind the top performers. For Chinese input, DeepSeek-R1 maintained a leading position across all dimensions, forming the first tier alongside DeepSeek-V3, Gemini-2.0-Flash, and ERNIE-Bot. Meanwhile, Claude-3.5-Haiku, ZoeGPT, Llama3.3-70B-Instruct, CompliantGPT, HuatuoGPT, and BastionGPT ranked lower in multiple dimensions, with a significant gap relative to first-tier models.
conclusionThis study demonstrated LLMs' potential as medical consultation tools for double eyelid surgery, providing useful guidance for both English and Chinese users. Future research should focus on fine-tuning LLMs with more specialized medical data and exploring workflows for surgeon-LLM collaboration to validate their clinical utility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.