Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41526686›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2026

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) outcomes following topical therapy.

Frances Davies, Michael K Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frances DaviesLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK. frances.davies@lthtr.nhs.uk.ORCID 0009-0000-8269-738X
Michael K ButlerUniversity of Greater Manchester, Bolton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis real-world, retrospective review of SLT outcomes at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust aimed to establish whether there is any net benefit in using topical drop treatment prior to SLT compared with proceeding directly to SLT as a first-line treatment. Several studies have shown that SLT gives the greatest reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) for eyes that have not received prior treatment with drops. Here, we look at different topical therapies used prior to SLT and investigate SLT efficacy following these.

methodData were collected from 196 SLT naïve eyes with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma who underwent SLT between January 2022 and May 2022. The eyes had received either no prior topical therapy or one or more topical IOP-lowering agents.

resultsNo significant difference was found in the overall reduction in IOP after SLT between eyes treated with prostaglandin analogue (PGA) drops alone prior to SLT (7.89 mmHg, n = 74) and eyes that received SLT as first-line treatment (6.88 mmHg, n = 56). Eyes also treated with beta-blockers did show a greater reduction in IOP.

conclusionThis retrospective study, based in a UK NHS centre, found no significant benefit in using PGA drops prior to SLT compared to SLT as first-line treatment for lowering IOP.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsGlaucoma, Open-AngleLaser TherapyOcular HypertensionProstaglandins, SyntheticTrabeculectomyAdministration, TopicalAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureOphthalmic SolutionsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsProstaglandins, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID41526686
PMCPMC12957426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.