ArticleScientific reports2026
Electrical current injury shows no specific acute histological changes in peripheral nerves and their vascular supply.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The type and extent of histological changes after acute electrical injury are a matter of interest and debate. To investigate the acute changes associated with electric current, we used an animal model consisting of 21 healthy adult male and female New Zealand White conventionally bred domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with an average weight of 3.0 kg. The animals were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 - controls (5 animals), Group 2 - exposed to low-voltage current (8 animals), and Group 3 - exposed to high-voltage current (8 animals). Electrodes were placed on shaved areas on the right hind limb. Immediately after current application, animals were sacrificed using high doses of anesthetic. Next, sites of current application, femoral neurovascular bundles, femoral muscle samples (including its fascia), heart muscle samples, and abdominal aorta samples were collected for study. The samples were then processed for histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical examination. Compared with the control group, no acute changes were found in the collected samples, except for the areas of current application where the thermal effect of current applications were observed. Post-current tissue damage described in the literature is not useful for immediate diagnosis. Diagnosis is often only possible after several tens of minutes to several hours, with observed tissue injury presumably resulting from electroporation or as part of tissue repair processes. We concluded that acute tissue changes after electric current injury are not specific except for heat-related skin and soft tissue changes at the point of electrocution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.