ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Predicting anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade response in melanoma patients with spatially aware machine learning models.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma: Emerging Approaches in Digital Pathology, Spatial Profiling and Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an acute need to accurately identify patients with advanced melanoma who are most likely to respond to anti-PD1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. While anti-PD1 therapy can be highly effective in advanced melanoma patients, only 30-40% of patients respond well. In this study, we apply single-cell spatial proteomics together with statistical and machine learning (ML) methods to successfully predict advanced melanoma patient response to anti-PD1 ICB in a cohort of 12 patients with >8 million cells. While no single molecular feature is sufficient to predict ICB response in our cohort, ML models integrating multiple molecular features accurately predict response in 11 of 12 patients. A recurrent cellular neighborhood analysis revealed a tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes niche that was present in the tumors of most responders. This neighborhood, tumor microenvironment immune cell composition, and levels of nitric oxide synthases were all important features used by our ML models to make accurate predictions. Optimal predictive performance by our ML models-a ROC AUC of 0.76-was achieved when using all molecular features, including cellular spatial relationships, but limiting our analysis to only immune-rich tissue regions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning models to accurately predict patient response to anti-PD1 ICB therapy using spatial proteomics datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.