Observational studyScientific reports2026
Device-measured capillary refill time identifies critically ill cases in the emergency department.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capillary refill time (CRT) is a rapid, non-invasive indicator of tissue hypoperfusion and is associated with severity in critically ill patients. However, its clinical utility in the emergency department (ED) remains unclear, particularly when assessed using a quantitative device. We conducted a prospective, single-center observational study to evaluate whether device-measured CRT upon ED arrival is associated with clinical severity. One hundred nineteen adult patients transported to the ED by ambulance between August 2023 and October 2024 were enrolled. CRT was measured using the quantitative CRT device, and the average of three readings was analyzed. Critical illness was defined as an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 25. Among the participants, 27 (23%) had high APACHE II scores. CRT was significantly prolonged in this group (2.56 [1.84-3.36] vs. 1.67 [1.18-2.48] seconds, p = 0.0012) and showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than lactate (AUC: CRT, 0.702; lactate, 0.669). CRT also demonstrated a weak but significant positive correlation with lactate levels (rs = 0.24, p = 0.0087) as well as a trend toward significant correlation with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (rs = 0.18, p = 0.051). These findings suggest that device-measured CRT is associated with clinical severity and may aid in the early identification of critically ill patients in emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.