ArticleScientific reports2026
Modeling and optimization of sustainable ternary concrete incorporating rice husk ash and extracted micro silica.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical and microstructural performance evaluation for cement-based mortar: calcined mud powder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete production accounts for a significant share of global CO2 emissions, underscoring the need for sustainable supplementary cementitious materials. This study evaluates a ternary cementitious system incorporating extracted micro-silica (EMS) and rice husk ash (RHA) as partial cement replacements to enhance compressive strength and reduce cement dependency. An experimental program was conducted on mixtures with varying EMS and RHA dosages, followed by predictive modelling and optimization using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Optimal mixtures containing 10–15% EMS and 15–25% RHA achieved higher compressive strength than the control mix, whereas higher replacement levels reduced strength due to particle agglomeration and weak hydration products. SEM analysis confirmed the improved microstructure in the optimized mixture, characterized by refined C-S-H networks and reduced porosity. The RSM model achieved strong predictive accuracy (R² = 0.95, RMSE = 2.7 MPa), while the ANN model achieved R² = 0.98 and RMSE = 1.9 MPa. These findings provide valuable insights for designing high-performance, sustainable concrete that relies less on traditional cementitious materials. Future work should focus on evaluating the long-term durability and environmental impact of the optimized mixtures in real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.