ArticleScientific reports2026
Studying carbon emission effects on ecological welfare performance in Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration using super efficiency network SBM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban agglomerations are crucial for achieving dual-carbon goals, and the interaction between carbon emissions and ecological welfare performance (EWP) remains unclear. EWP refers to the efficiency of converting ecological resources into human welfare. Taking the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration (CCUA) during 2012–2022 as a case, this study decomposes EWP into two sub-stages, constructs an evaluation system including ecological input, economic level, undesirable output and welfare output, and calculates EWP of 176 samples using the Super-Efficiency Network Slack-Based Measure Model (Super-NSBM). This study further analyzes EWP’s evolution mechanism through panel Tobit model and spatial econometric analysis, revealing the temporal and spatial characteristics and driving factors of EWP in CCUA. Results show: (1) The average EWP of CCUA was 0.629, mainly limited by low economic welfare efficiency. (2) Spatially, EWP of eastern cities in CCUA was higher and that of western cities was lower, with polarization in both EWP stages. (3) CCUA achieved high economic growth at the cost of low EWP, while carbon emissions exerted positive impacts and positive spillover effects on EWP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.